|
Sunday,
March 2, 2003
Readings: Ho
2: 14-15; 19-20 I will betroth you to myself
forever Responsorial
Psalm 103 2
Cor 3: 1-6 You are a letter from Christ, drawn
up by us Mk
2: 18-22 Why do your disciples not fast? In
this Sunday’s gospel we see Jesus’ second encounter with the enemies
that accuse and harass him. A week ago, it was for forgiving sins,
today it will be about fasting. It takes place in an environment of
mistrust and hostility by the Jewish authorities because of the polemical
statements Jesus makes about himself and his mission. The underlying
option that Jesus has made, the causes of the conflict with his adversaries
and the decision to eliminate him also begin to appear here. Jesus
himself perceives this and lets his followers know. He explicitly
tells us he has come for a mission among sinners, and that he is the
lord of the Sabbath, the bridegroom of the Kingdom (a term exclusively
used for God in Judaism), while he aids the sick. We
are in the midst of the controversies from Mark’s chapters 2 and 3,
where Jesus reveals himself as the Bridegroom and shows us something
basic about the novelty of the Kingdom in today’s gospel. The first
level is a mere comparison with a wedding feast, not a time for fasting
but for great joy. But a more current aspect is the vision of what
happened to Jesus and his disciples; the wedding time is the presence
of God in our history with the one God sent among us. This is like
a wedding of God to human beings. It is the presence of the Bridegroom
amidst human history. This is why it is presented as the point of
liberation from legal or ritual things, which sometimes fill us with
anxiety and don’t let us see the real message intended for us. Sometimes,
instead of feeling free, we feel enslaved by these practices. Jesus’
mercy towards the poor and marginated is a defense against the exploiters,
against the things they sometimes do in order to implement that margination
and slavery. Jesus clearly states that he has brought something new
to the Old Testament, a novelty that does not allow for commitments
to the old. The novelty is announced today with the comparison to
a wedding; it briefly alludes to the fact that his death will be violent,
but that it cannot be reconciled to the Law. And it highlights the
non-commitment to the old, through the image of the new cloth being
added to an old garment. He goes beyond the differences that some
make between what is pure and impure and places the Law in question. For
Jesus, this is the way to present the Kingdom, and everything he does
is captured by the evangelist as a sign of that Kingdom. In today’s
text, we don’t see a miraculous sign but rather a position regarding
the Jewish fast, which ultimately represents the total salvation signified
by the Kingdom through the presence of the Bridegroom. Hosea,
in today’s first reading, is helpful to us as a summary of daily life.
In verses 14 and 15, he recalls the past that the people of Israel
lived, far from God, seeking other gods, which is perhaps our situation.
But in verses 19 and 20, he gives us enormous and extraordinary news:
God’s proposal, expressed in the image Jesus uses in the gospel of
Mark. Weddings, a symbol of the presence of God in the Old Testament,
and a proposal made from a law, not of human beings but of God. The
sensation proposed to the people, to those who listen to the word
of Jesus and to us today, is the joy felt in weddings, in all those
projects that can begin in that phase of life. Marrying
is the possibility to begin a new life, to start a project, no longer
alone but in the company of someone who will most likely make us change
many mindsets and customs. We will let go of things we’re used to
doing and will surely begin to do things we never imagined. Matrimony
is an experience that signifies newness. Paul
will use the same image of the novelty that juxtaposes the Old and
New Testaments in the letter to the Corinthians; the law not on tablets
but in one’s heart, written not with ink but with the Spirit. We
should apply this image and message to our lives today. Each one of
us is called to return to God (Hosea), to experience some novelty
in our lives (Paul) and to see in Jesus the novelty and the person
who carries out this new project, not for each one individually but
for the community. Life as a couple cannot be just an experience for
two people; it is an experience that must also add to the well being
of the community. A couple should not love one another in an exclusive
way; it should live its love in such a way that we in the community
may see that this is the way, although even more intensely, that God
loves us. This
coming Wednesday is “Ash Wednesday”, the beginning of Lent. Perhaps
it would be helpful to do an introduction this Sunday, as a preparation,
since next Sunday we will be talking about Lent as something already
underway. Actually, for Christians, “every day is good and holy”,
and we don’t have “lucky or tragic” days. The vision of the New Testament
and the modern and healthy secularizing vision, has taken away the
mystery surrounding the “holy times”, which used to weigh so heavily
on the experience of the Christian community. Today’s urban life doesn’t
lend itself to 40-day religious celebrations. At any rate, the Christian
community needs an explanation of the meaning, value and relativity
of Lent. Bibliography
for further study on this gospel: LOHFINK,
G. La Iglesia que Jesús quería (The Church that Jesus wanted),
Bilbao 1986 MATEOS,
J. La utopía de Jesús (Jesus’ Utopia) Spain 1990 MEEKS,
W.A. Los primeros cristianos urbanos (The First Urban Christians)
Salamanca 1983 NOLAN,
A. ¿Quién es este hombre? (Who Is
This Man?) Santander 1984 STEGMANN,
G. Jesús de Nazaret, esperanza de los pobres (Jesus of Nazareth,
hope of the poor) Salamanca 1991 THEISSEN,
G. Sociología del movimiento de Jesús (Sociology of Jesus’
movement) Santander 1979 THEISSEN,
G. Estudios de sociología del cristianismo primitivo (Sociology
studies of primitive Christianity) Salamanca 1985 For Personal Consideration As
we reflect on the scene presented by today’s gospel, which makes so
many religious practices relative, we feel questioned about our Christian
faith. Isn’t our faith perhaps, sometimes more doubtful than certain?
More traditional than personal? More verbal than vital? As a community
of faith, are we capable of sharing our lives and the gifts that the
Lord gives us? What
are relations within the community like? What process of integration
exists? How do we link participation in our community to participation
in other groups with which we are apostolically related? What value
do we give in our daily lives to the elements that constitute us as
a community: the Eucharist, the Word, the presence of Mary, the active
and open relationship to the people? Or do we limit ourselves to the
external things that identify us? For the Community’s Reflection -That
Jesus is the Bridegroom of the Kingdom Wedding, or that God is the
spouse of the soul, are metaphors of religious language which are
best expressed by suggestive images. But in the 21st century,
people need to fill out the language of metaphors with other ways
to touch their situation. What do we think of the religious or spiritual
life style that many practice, in which everything is a dialogue,
an almost spousal intimacy between one’s conscience and God, between
myself and Jesus? Is that way of living religiosity legitimate? Why?
Is it “a way”? What dangers might it imply? Could today’s Christian
feel uncomfortable with that form of design for his or her spiritual
relationship to God? Could their spiritual lives be rightly shaped
in another way? For example? -It
is clear that Jesus did not speak of mending old cloth with new material
by coincidence, as it appears in Marks’ gospel; clearly those words
reflected the situation of the community of Jesus’ followers, when
they discover the incompatibility between the synagogue and the need
to follow new and independent paths. Maybe that’s when they realized
the great novelty that Jesus’ life and message represented. Later
on in history, however, many old things would come in to the Church
which do not seem to be compatible with the radical “novelty” of the
gospel. For example? What things, customs, rules, traits, usages,
norms and givens existing in the Church are “old cloths” upon which
we should not waste energy “mending”? -Lent
begins this coming Wednesday. There is no doubt that, despite the
good will that many well intentioned Christians display, Lent as such
is a celebration that has been on the down-turn in the Church for
some time. 1) Why? Are there traits in modern mentality that make
it impossible to consider a period of time “sacred”? Which traits?
2)
Sooner than later the Lenten liturgy and its very concept will be
renewed; if you were asked to make a proposal about how to focus the
renewal of the pastoral conception of Lent for all the Church, what
would you propose? Give three or four general principles and some
specific suggestions. 3) Returning to reality, for the Lenten season
beginning this Wednesday, what ideas or specific suggestions could
we give to our Christian communities to give meaning to this Lent? -Ashes,
prayer, fasting, mortification are “penitential” elements typical
of Lent. Let’s comment on each one of them. For the Prayer of the Faithful The
word of God that we have heard is the basis of our faith, nourishes
our hope and helps to build community over and above many commandments
and norms that bind us. Let us pray together and say: May your word,
Lord, be light for our journey. -That
the strength of the Spirit may help us to renounce the idols that
the new paganism has built under the norm, the law and certain behavior
that distances us from our brothers and sisters. Let us pray to the
Lord. -That
all social groups, contributing with their sights set on the common
good, may build a new society, open to universal fraternity. Let us
pray to the Lord. -That
in this world immersed in the culture of the relative and temporary,
the community of Christians may affirm in a coherent way the absolute
values of Love and of Life. Let us pray to the Lord. -That
we Christians may strengthen the links of communion with members of
other faiths and religions and thus be a sign of reconciliation for
all of Humanity. Let us pray to the Lord. Extend
your hand, Father, over this tired and oppressed Humanity; grant us
a faith rich in memory and secure in Jesus, who walks alongside us
so we may be bold in prophetic witness to your Kingdom. You who live
and promote life forever and ever. Amen. Let Us Pray Good
God, who allows us to be at this Eucharist, and has told us that wherever
two or three are gathered in your name, you are there, answer the
wishes and pledges that we present to you today, so that together
we may build a world closer to the values of the Kingdom, of Truth
and of Life in you. Let us feel the presence of your Son who lives
and makes us live with you, forever and ever. Amen. or
God,
your face is sometimes hidden from us. We’d like to finally see you.
We utter your name, kneel before you and pray for an answer. We want
to always be awaiting you, sure that we see your face in Christ and
in our littlest brothers and sisters. May your Spirit accompany us
always in this confidence we feel, forever and ever. Amen. |
|||
|
Claretian Communications,
Inc. 8 Mayumi St. UP Village, Diliman 1101, Quezon City, Philippines
|
|||