|
Sunday,
September 14, 2003 Readings: Today
is the feast of the «Exaltation» of the Holy Cross. The feast
is about the symbol that identifies Christianity throughout
the word, just as the half moon identifies Islam and the six-pointed
star formed by two triangles identifies Judaism. Based on a kind of magic mentality, the cross has had a history of being valued almost as much as the Christ who died on it. The sign of the cross has purportedly frightened demons, dispelled curses, «signed» all its devotees, and been traced in the air millions of times, showering beneficent blessings. In
popular piety, Christ has been perceived above all as the
suffering one, the condemned, the scourged, the crucified,
the man of sorrows, who died amid unbearable sufferings. The
cross has been a symbol of sorrow, both of Christ’s pain and
of suffering in general. For Christians, the suffering of
Christ has a universal meaning. From
the point of view of the understanding of the cross as sorrowful,
its ‘exaltation’ does not cease to be problematic. Frequently,
pastoral ministers try to avoid these problems, evading them,
or not mentioning them, looking the other way, or speaking
of other things. This evasive method is not the best way to
serve Christian people. We think it is better to confront
the problems, to name them, and to set limits. This is what
we will try to do. The
first great danger is that of «exaltation» itself, because
it can seem to be exaltation of suffering for suffering?s
sake, as if it had some Christian value in and of itself.
It even perpetuates the image of a suffering God who loves
pain, who seems to be happy to see suffering, or who only
shows love and generosity to humans in exchange for pain and
anguish. Many
of the promises, ‘offerings’, of folk religion are made according
to this scheme: I will sacrifice myself, I will offer God
some pain that I cause myself, as a payment given to God in
exchange for a favor I ask. This God to whom suffering is
pleasing and valuable is not the Christian God; the exaltation
of a cross which includes the image of such a God would not
be a Christian exaltation. There
is a very serious problem with this still-prevailing theology,
according to which God sent the Son into the world to suffer,
to suffer horrendously, because the Son would be the only
one capable of offering infinite reparation to the dignity
of God, who had been offended by human beings in an ‘original
sin’ which, historically speaking, never took place. Without
any real basis in the gospel, this theology appeared with
the passage of the first centuries, and it was St. Anselm
of Canterbury (XI Century) who gave to the cross the meaning
that has come all the way down to us in our children’s catechisms.
It is the classic vision of ‘redemption’, the death of Jesus
on the redemptive cross, which «paid» the Father, with the
Son’s own suffering, so that the Father would re-establish
the good order of his relationship with Humanity. Firmly united
to this theology is the «sacrifice» of Christ on the Cross.
This theology, on the one hand, results today an unacceptable
image of God. On the other hand, it is a theology that figures
«inexplicably» in many official documents. To celebrate the
Exaltation of the Holy Cross without tackling these problems
would be more comfortable, but not more sincere, nor profitable,
nor pedagogical. The
cross of Christ shouldn’t be used as a symbol of all the structural
limitations and natural finiteness of human nature. Frailty
is one natural dimension of human life (the crosses of this
life), but the cross of Christ is not something natural; it
is something historical. The cross of Christ -unless we want
to fall into mystifications- does not consist of Christ’s
human difficulties and limitations, nor ours: nor illness,
limitations, accidents or bad luck. Those are not the cross
of Christ; they are the ups and downs, the situations of human
life, which we must learn to bear, again and again, with grace
and good humor. The
cross of Christ was not «God’s design» but a very human scheme.
Jesus, for his part, didn’t go looking for the cross: «Let
this chalice pass from me», nor would he have sought the cross,
in itself, for his disciples. That «Ave Crux, Spes unica!»
(Hail, the Cross, our only hope!) of the classic saying, needs
to be interpreted cautiously. Neither God, nor Christ, nor
we ourselves, are to love the cross; on the contrary, we must
wage war on it. The
task of the Christian, as of Jesus, is to do battle, to liberate
human beings from suffering, «to do all the good that can
be done», as would have been said about last Sunday’s gospel.
For sure, to fight against the cross can cause animosity to
arise in those who are selfishly interested in perpetuating
systems of and structures of oppression, and in persons who
impose a cross on those who fight to free human beings from
every cross. Another
more modern and correct saying is: «Seek the Truth, the Cross
will follow». We don’t need to seek the cross, although we
also should not retreat one inch from the truth, for fear
that the cross will be put upon In
the long run, what we must exalt is not the cross, but the
courage of Jesus who, with a resolute love, chose the Kingdom
and with it the cross, which he surely foresaw would be his
fate. The exaltation of the fidelity of Jesus to the Cause
of the Kingdom is the true content of this feast. Some people
get frightened when we do these critical re-readings. To them,
it seems very negative. They prefer to speak only of the positive,
and they dismiss the rest, let it disappear into obscurity.
We don’ t share that opinion. We are in a time of theological
transition, a transition that proceeds slowly, precisely because
of the lack of a critical sense in theology and in preaching.
If preachers (and Christian formation groups) took on, as
a permanent task, doing a critical interpretation of all the
thinking that still injures Christianity, we would, without
doubt, be in a better position to dialogue with the real world.
On the other hand, all renewal of thought and life necessitates
a moment of deconstruction; without it, true renovation is
often impossible. For
the revision of life -Do
I seek the truth at all costs, without becoming a coward in
the face of the possibility that I may have to endure the
cross? -Do
I accept the crosses (historical, not natural) that I carry?
(Name them; review them in detail within myself). -Christ,
in his solidarity with humanity, «despoils» himself of his
divine nature and takes on the condition of a slave. What
does this gesture of Jesus say about how I live, my life style?
How far does my solidarity with the poor extend? What must
I abandon to be in solidarity with suffering humanity? For
group meetings For
more on this topic about the cross, we especially recommend: -"How
to preach the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ today, by Leonardo
Boff, which appeared in "Pasión de Cristo, pasión del mundo"
(ediciones en Sal Terrae de España, Indoamerican Press de
Bogotá 1978). It is a short text, which lends itself well
to biblical study or reflection groups or to the whole community.
The English translation might be available on the website
http://servicioskoinonia.org/relat/217.htm. -To
be conscious of the exaggerations, which have been widespread
on this topic of the cross through Christian history, see
the study SESBOÜÉ A somber anthology?, on http://servicioskoinonia.org/relat/333.htm For
the prayers of the faithful
For
the community prayer God,
our Father, grant us the gift of knowing how to find, in our
actual historical situation, a profound sense of our Christian
mission, so that with all that is implied in being faithful
to your designs for our society, we may commit ourselves to
our task of living and building your Kingdom. Through Jesus
Christ, our Lord. |
|||
|
Claretian Communications,
Inc. 8 Mayumi St. UP Village, Diliman 1101, Quezon City, Philippines
|
|||